Notes

Mahāmāyūrī­vidyārājñī (rig sngags kyi rgyal mo rma bya chen po, Toh 559). See The Queen of Incantations: The Great Peahen.

For a similar extract of the same text, see The Quintessence of the Peahen (Māyūrīvidyā­garbha, Toh 560).

This text, Toh 943, and all those contained in this same volume (gzungs, e), are listed as being located in volume 100 of the Degé Kangyur by the Buddhist Digital Resource Center (BDRC). However, several other Kangyur databases‍—including the eKangyur that supplies the digital input version displayed by the 84000 Reading Room‍—list this work as being located in volume 101. This discrepancy is partly due to the fact that the two volumes of the gzungs ’dus section are an added supplement not mentioned in the original catalog, and also hinges on the fact that the compilers of the Tōhoku catalog placed another text‍—which forms a whole, very large volume‍—the Vimala­prabhā­nāma­kālacakra­tantra­ṭīkā (dus ’khor ’grel bshad dri med ’od, Toh 845), before the volume 100 of the Degé Kangyur, numbering it as vol. 100, although it is almost certainly intended to come right at the end of the Degé Kangyur texts as volume 102; indeed its final fifth chapter is often carried over and wrapped in the same volume as the Kangyur dkar chags (catalog). Please note this discrepancy when using the eKangyur viewer in this translation.

Note that there is a discrepancy among various databases for cataloging the Toh 943 version of this text within vol. 100 or 101 of the Degé Kangyur. See Toh 943, n.3, for details.

We translate this having the very common Sanskrit expression namaḥ samanta­buddhānām apratihata­śāsanānām in mind. The Tibetan in this form would mean something like “to the Buddha who teaches without opposition from anywhere.”

We prefer this form, that of the Compendium of Dhāraṇīs version. The Tantra version has piśuni. The meaning is something like “slanderer” (fem.). Such opprobrious epithets are not uncommon for deities.

Here, too, we side with the version in the Compendium of Dhāraṇīs. The Tantra version names the parent text as The Essence (snying po) of The Great Peahen, but this cannot be the case. Instead of what we translate here as “to uphold” to capture the ambiguity of the original, Tatakaragupta, when discussing a similar dhāraṇī said to encapsulate The Perfection of Wisdom in One Hundred Thousand Lines (see The Dhāraṇī of “The Perfection of Wisdom in One Hundred Thousand Lines,” Toh 576/932), is more explicit when he replaces the verb with kaṇṭhasthīkṛ (“to place it in one’s throat”), which is the Sanskrit idiom for “to learn by heart.” He also spells out the benefit as the “meritorious karmic fruit” (puṇyaphala) of memorizing the parent text. This sentence is then followed by a fascinating short discussion, which merits to be quoted in full: “Surely, this is an exaggeration! No, one should not say this. For countless thus-gone ones have empowered this dhāraṇī to serve as a method for gaining the equipment of merit for women, immature people, and simpletons, as well as for learned people whose minds are confused, just like the pole of a snake charmer[, which is preprepared by the expert snake charmer to be effective even when he is no longer present,] for removing poison; however, it is not a method for gaining the knowledge conveyed by The [Perfection of Wisdom in] One Hundred Thousand Lines. This should be understood to apply in other cases [i.e., where the text is abbreviated into a dhāraṇī] as well” (nanv atyuktir eveti. na caitad vaktavyam. yataḥ strībāla­mūrkhān paryākuli­tamatīn paṇḍitān praty api puṇya­saṃbhārasādhana­tvenā­saṃkhyeya­tathāgatair adhiṣṭhi­teyaṃ dhāriṇī, yathā viṣaharatvena gāruḍikaṃ stambhaḥ; na tu lakṣāprati­pādita­jñāna­sādhana­tvena. evam anyatrāpi boddhavyaḥ). In his note to this dhāraṇī, he reiterates the point about “to uphold” meaning “to memorize” and promises as the reward the fruit of reciting the text (pāṭhaphala).

Śatasāhasrikā­prajñā­pāramitā­dhāraṇī (Toh 576/932).